0 Society Can Not Charge Service Tax On Maintenance

In this video it is clear that- Society can not Charge Service Tax on Maintenance. But It is Not clear- If the All maintenance done by Builder - than Service Tax is applicable or not. In Somdatt LandMark- Sector-116 Mohali- project done by SDB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd continuously charged Service tax on Maintenance since last more than a year. I already ask them many times- But never reply by them.
               I don't know- who is Right or who is Wrong???

anyhow check the video recorded fro tv channel in property guru show- and the maintenance bill too.

Look at my My maintenance bills with service tax, cess, sec. cess tex.

Maintenance bill at Somdatt Landmark sector-116 mohali, with various service tax

Maintenance bill at Somdatt Landmark sector-116 mohali, with various service tax

0 No reply from SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. / Somdatt Builder Pvt. Ltd. regarding open parking

Email sent to the company(SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. -formerly named as Somdatt Builder Pvt. Ltd.):  but never got any reply on this, at least they must tell-  I am right or wrong.

Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> for your information-about open car parking. 5 messages Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:47 PM To: sdbhoaccounts@rediffmail.com, somdattrealestate@yahoo.co.in, somdatt1@nda.vsnl.net.in, sdbl@airtelbroadband.in, somdattlandmark@rediffmail.com, suchetmonga@yahoo.co.in, rohit@mongarealtors.com Cc: Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.om1@gmail.com> Dear sir I am sending following article from tribune and the about the order of supreme court from the news. and will send you the video copy of this too- in which it is clearly said that- how it was false transaction if made. it is request - plz dont charge this amount for parking atleast from new buyers.  if you have anything in new-than plz update us. ----------- An Important study fro supreme court: Link: http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=40104   From news:   http://www.indianexpress.com/news/open-stilt-parking-spaces-are-common-areas-builders-can-t-charge-extra-sc/676177/

matter from above link:
Open, stilt parking spaces are common areas, builders can’t charge extra: SC - 

Krishnadas Rajagopal : New Delhi, Thu Sep 02 2010, 02:38 hrs

Flat purchasers need not shell out extra money from their savings to buy parking spaces, both open and closed, from property developers at the time of sale.

"Open-to-sky" areas or "stilted" (covered) portions of their flat complexes, usable as parking spaces, cannot be sold separately by flat builders/promoters/developers as "garage", the Supreme Court has ruled.

These spaces are part of the "common areas" in flat complexes and not "saleable independently as a flat or along with a flat", the court said in a judgment.

The verdict sets a precedent even as the apex court took note that builders/promoters/developers were "indulging in malpractices in the sale and transfer of flats and the flat purchasers were being exploited".

The judgment delivered Tuesday by a bench of Justices R M Lodha and A K Patnaik comes in the backdrop of interpreting the legislative intent behind enacting the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1969.

The court made the observations while dismissing an appeal filed by Mumbai promoter Nahalchand Laloochand Private Limited, seeking permanent injunction against a co-operative housing society to whom they had sold a few properties in Anand Nagar, Dahisar (East) in the city. They accused society members of "encroaching" into 25 stilt parking spaces in the building.

The court said promoters will not be put to any financial prejudice by treating parking spaces as common areas since "he (promoter) is entitled to charge price for the common areas and facilities from each flat purchaser in proportion to the carpet area of the flat".

"Can a promoter take a common passage/lobbies or say staircase or the RG area out of purview of 'common areas and facilities' by not prescribing or defining the same in the 'common areas'?" asked the court and illustrated how the Maharashtra law mandates the promoter to describe the "common areas and facilities" in the advertisement as well as in the agreement later with the buyer.

"The promoter is required to indicate the price of the flat, including the proportionate price of the common areas and facilities. If the promoter does not disclose the common areas and facilities, he does so at his own peril," the bench observed.
The court clarified that "stilt" or covered parking spaces were "common areas", and would not cease to be so even if the promoter fails to describe them as common spaces.

Flat purchasers need not shell out extra money from their savings to buy parking spaces, both open and closed, from property developers at the time of sale.
"Open-to-sky" areas or "stilted" (covered) portions of their flat complexes, usable as parking spaces, cannot be sold separately by flat builders/promoters/developers as "garage", the Supreme Court has ruled.
These spaces are part of the "common areas" in flat complexes and not "saleable independently as a flat or along with a flat", the court said in a judgment.
The verdict sets a precedent even as the apex court took note that builders/promoters/developers were "indulging in malpractices in the sale and transfer of flats and the flat purchasers were being exploited".
The judgment delivered Tuesday by a bench of Justices R M Lodha and A K Patnaik comes in the backdrop of interpreting the legislative intent behind enacting the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1969.
The court made the observations while dismissing an appeal filed by Mumbai promoter Nahalchand Laloochand Private Limited, seeking permanent injunction against a co-operative housing society to whom they had sold a few properties in Anand Nagar, Dahisar (East) in the city. They accused society members of "encroaching" into 25 stilt parking spaces in the building.
The court said promoters will not be put to any financial prejudice by treating parking spaces as common areas since "he (promoter) is entitled to charge price for the common areas and facilities from each flat purchaser in proportion to the carpet area of the flat".
"Can a promoter take a common passage/lobbies or say staircase or the RG area out of purview of 'common areas and facilities' by not prescribing or defining the same in the 'common areas'?" asked the court and illustrated how the Maharashtra law mandates the promoter to describe the "common areas and facilities" in the advertisement as well as in the agreement later with the buyer.

- See more at: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/open-stilt-parking-spaces-are-common-areas-builders-can-t-charge-extra-sc/676177/#sthash.hllzY2YU.dpuFlat purchasers need not shell out extra money from their savings to buy parking spaces, both open and closed, from property developers at the time of sale.

"Open-to-sky" areas or "stilted" (covered) portions of their flat complexes, usable as parking spaces, cannot be sold separately by flat builders/promoters/developers as "garage", the Supreme Court has ruled.
These spaces are part of the "common areas" in flat complexes and not "saleable independently as a flat or along with a flat", the court said in a judgment.
The verdict sets a precedent even as the apex court took note that builders/promoters/developers were "indulging in malpractices in the sale and transfer of flats and the flat purchasers were being exploited".
The judgment delivered Tuesday by a bench of Justices R M Lodha and A K Patnaik comes in the backdrop of interpreting the legislative intent behind enacting the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1969.
The court made the observations while dismissing an appeal filed by Mumbai promoter Nahalchand Laloochand Private Limited, seeking permanent injunction against a co-operative housing society to whom they had sold a few properties in Anand Nagar, Dahisar (East) in the city. They accused society members of "encroaching" into 25 stilt parking spaces in the building.
The court said promoters will not be put to any financial prejudice by treating parking spaces as common areas since "he (promoter) is entitled to charge price for the common areas and facilities from each flat purchaser in proportion to the carpet area of the flat".
"Can a promoter take a common passage/lobbies or say staircase or the RG area out of purview of 'common areas and facilities' by not prescribing or defining the same in the 'common areas'?" asked the court and illustrated how the Maharashtra law mandates the promoter to describe the "common areas and facilities" in the advertisement as well as in the agreement later with the buyer.

- See more at: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/open-stilt-parking-spaces-are-common-areas-builders-can-t-charge-extra-sc/676177/#sthash.hllzY2YU.dpuff

0 I pay Rs 50,000 for Open parking To SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd in Somdatt Landmark Mohali

Builder(Somdatt Builder Pvt. Ltd.) never give any parking to us, We know as per law - one parking is free with each apartment anyhow I paid so much amount Rs 50,000 for the open car parking and they gave it on the Road-- and they called it as Right to use

Check the Images:             Open car Parking Pics

Above are spaces provided to flat owners who gave builder Rs 50,000 for open car parking. I feel this is not fair to give spaces on road. And moreover they promised for GUEST Parking- I don't know where they will provide. I feel we were cheated by Builder. As per NBC 2005( National Building Code of India) the  Road should be clear always-for any kind of emergency- like Ambulance, Fire Fighting Van. So that Any emergency vehicle can move freely and here even two cars can not cross each other.

Rest I don't know---
More Important Links are:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/open-stilt-parking-spaces-are-common-areas-builders-can-t-charge-extra-sc/676177/

0 Why am I fighting with this SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. company on the project Somdatt landmark Sector-116?

Because of:
a article published in tribune: 
available at this page http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120526/real.htm

Fight for your right

Under what circumstances can you file a complaint against builder/developer with the consumer court?
First of all a buyer should let the builder know about the grievance and send a notice to him in writing. It should be sent by registered post or Under Postal Certificate.
In case the builder refuses to accept the notice, retain the proof of the notice i.e. a copy of the notice. The evidence of sending the notice is legitimate in the Consumer Court under Section 28A (3) of the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act of 2002 and will be affirmed as the notice has been suitably served.
Any person can file a complaint against the builder, developer, housing with the consumer court under the following circumstances:
n Delivered a house that does not comply with the specifications agreed upon.
n Did not provide for free parking space within the compound / complex.
n Charged higher than agreed amount.
n Did not form co-operative housing society and handed it over to its members.
n Did not provide for water storage tank.
n Did not give a receipt against the paid amount.
n Did not provide for enough ventilation and light.
n Delivered a poor quality construction.
n Did not deliver the house within the agreed time limit. If time limit not mentioned, it is assumed that the construction will be finished within maximum of two years from the date of start of work.
n Did not give accounts for the expenses against which the builder has collected money, i.e. maintenance, electrical installations (transformer), etc.   

Fighting for above strikeout points.


The Quality Which They delivered to me:

0 How SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. calculated power backup bill in Somdatt Landmark Sector-116

The bill calculated by the company -- as

Description	Total No. Unit Consumed	Initial Reading	Current Reading	Rate (Per Unit(Rs.)	Amount(Rs.)
Power Back Up Charges (Flat No- 403 Ruby Tower No-06)	68	4	64	12.6	806
Add: Service Tax @10%					81
Add: Cess 2%					2
Add: Sec. Cess 1%					1
Total					890

The bill should be instead of this:

 Unit consumed = current reading - initial reading

                          = 64 - 4

                       = 60   instead of 68 they written

Total bill                      = 60*12.60

                                 =  Rs. 756/-  instead of Rs. 806/- and NO tax applicable on it.

                               

when we complaint such things- what they replied: just read the below post

http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2013/07/sdb-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-serve-me.html

and check the original bill copy also in post:
http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2013/07/sdb-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-serve-me_13.html

Orignal power backup bill copy.

0 I hope- one day I wish to talk to the owner- of SDB Infrastructure Private Limited

Almost to all peoples I talked S.K Sharma, Zora Singh, Monga group every one appointed here for this project (Somdatt Landmark, Sector-116, Mohali- done by - SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Marketing Partner- Monga Realtors Private Limited )including Shankar (appointed at Delhi I think he is account head in Delhi) on his office landline. But no solution got from them. Everyone thinks, first we please them by moving around them. We did this also, but not got any kind of satisfactory result. Divide and Rule is the policy here, which are following by the staff. Its really painful for us. Inspite of doing court case on the company, still I believe in talk and sort out the problem on desk, but I think here Companies employees not want this, quite be possible the owners too- I heard the company's owners are very and genuine men, So I definitely want to talk them. The name of owners are Dr. Brahm Datt (Managing Director) and Dr.Inder Mohan (Vice Chairman). Rest is in their hand. I can pray only. So the lines for  Dr. Brahm Datt (Managing Director) and Dr.Inder Mohan (Vice Chairman)- Respected sir- It might be possible that you are not aware from the real story happening here. So please try once to talk us, else the fight for the rights continues till the things are not resolved. 

I can pray only, keeping my finger crossed- I hope- one day I will talk to you..

0 Writing to hindustan times: Fighting against somdatt builder

Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.om1@gmail.com>

---

please protect us..fighting against somdatt builder 1 message

---

Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.om1@gmail.com>	Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:58 PM
To: chdlivedesk@hindustantimes.com, hillary.victor@hindustantimes.com Cc: Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.om1@gmail.com>
Dear sir, it is really worst now.                 We are fighting a consumer case against SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The Project name is Somdatt Landmark , located at Sector-116, Mohali [Landran Kharar road]. i m start writing blog too:    http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/ Here Company continusoly forcing us- to withdraw the case in different ways. They are not entertaining our complaints. They just humiliate us. Even local police is not listening us. Even the staff complaint about us and police only listen to them. After Final notice-  On 6th July- They disconnect our power backup electricity and water supply due to non-bill payment of maintenance  .  We not paid because they did not give us any maintenance. So we sit on peaceful protest on hunger strike- because at least give us water supply/electricity. And we call the police by dialing 100 number, for the security reasons- because so many staff members starts revolving around us. At the evening police came- and they told us- to get up- a meeting will be arrange with project manager. But there is no meeting at later on. Instead of meeting they gave the complaint to police that we block the path road and they are try to compromise on condition to make all payments and to withdraw the case.  Else they will file a complaint –( parcha. Under section 309 attempt to suicide.) But on the name maintenance- They failed to give security—many time theft happened here- even from bike – petrol stole by someone and also tried to damage my property. They failed to give –complete club. They failed to give jogging track They failed to give Kids park(they give: with the sewerage plant and in it- 5-6 main holes in it- not safe for kids.) Unclean drinking water. After so much complaint – they installed the filter, but still some time lot of sand/ chlorine comes in it- By this – peoples can become blind. Its long story. Unclean area- many thing they started now after making so much complaints. And moreover- a non-behavioural staff.[even some staff peoples drunk on duty. But nobody listen us.] They give the parking – on road. No – free parking –which is mandatory by law passed by supreme court .They charged for 50,000 to park the vehicle on road. Never installed the second lift in the apartments. Even not telling us- about when to install. No-guest parking. No green area- very less green area is there. No Occupation Certificate / Completion certificate they have. As per law it is mandatory without this they can’t give the possession and even they can’t charge the taxes. Even – now- our life is in danger, they threaten us. For this we write to SSP mohali, and sent a registry on 20-july-yesterday. We clearly written in that- If anything happened to us, to our property, to our family, to our vehicle-They will be the only responsible for it. Sir Please, The only solutions we feel- is to come in media now.  We are requesting to cover us. Its a request. Regards Lokesh Kumar 921xxxxxxx67[hide for security reasons] flat- no- 403, Somdatt Landmark Sector-116, Mohali Landran-Kharar road

0 Good ones....

Good ones....

Be sure to taste your words before you spit them out.

---------------------------------------

"Its's better to have nobody, than to have someone

 who is half there, or doesn't want  to be there."

-Angelina Jolie

0 Why am I NOT Paying now the Maintenance BILL to SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd....

I knew it- one day - I need these ones- These picture are taken of common area-- which have to maintained by SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. But what they did.. check this picture taken with newspaper... There are many more.. but here....I just want to ask-- first just have a look on snaps..

and There are Thousand more.....but -- its difficult to show all here. because it will take to lot of time to load this blog too. So due to technical constraints, its difficult.. but i can...

Now tell me anyone... Should I pay these maintenance BILLS... My decision is NO...

But I deposit Power backup bill that is under protest..
Email proof for this is:
----------------------------------

Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com>

---

Power backup payment made under protest. 2 messages

---

Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com>	Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:58 PM
To: somdattlandmark <somdattlandmark@rediffmail.com>, somdattrealestate <somdattrealestate@yahoo.co.in>
As per your notice of power backup payment, I have deposited the amount in your account on 00562560002696 vide cheque no.546133 under protest. As said bill is based on wrong units of power backup and thus, it has been charged in excess. I already brought it into your notice.However, I reserve my right to claim said excess amount charged by you. amount recieved in bill: Rs3981/-, amount paid: Rs3981/- - left- nill -------------------------------------------------------------- and the bank receipt of this amount is here---

But Ultimately - They disconnect my.. POWER Backup Supply. Its just an example of humiliation and harassment...
ohhh........
In next post I will show the condition of my flat with snaps..

0 One more letter sent - to SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd...by residents...regarding Maintenance Bills ...

Here one more letter which sent to SDB Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ... in email of nov 2011 by society residents...
Just read it out...

Subject: GREVIANCE MAINTENANCE CHARGES SOMDATT LANDMARK SECTOR 116- MOHALI
Dear Mr. Brahm Datt,
We would like to convey our sincere New Year Greetings for a better, healthier and more peaceful life to you and to your family.
Please permit us to bring to your kind notice,inspite of all feedbacks given by us in the previous mails, we are sorry to say that we have not received any communication from your side.
We repeat the grievances on different affected location with seepage in all the rooms & Bathrooms in the flats. Which were shown to your officers of Landmark. Till date they are unable to resolve problem and find a permanent remedy. People at the site seems to be busy with new constructions, remains satisfied with sloppy attention.

1. We have got repaired our room’s walls so many times within 2 to 3 months, but having same condition after 4-5 days of repair.
2. Housekeeping in the towers are getting worse day by day ie. Lack of supervision/monitoring.
3. The area behind the Diamond Tower is full of Garbage, which gives a poor image of the community.

Maintenance Charges:
Your office is insisting on payment of MC from the date of handing over the flats. Maintenance charges are to be charged on the provision of basic facilities to the residents as per agreement:

1. Club building is not yet to be operational.
2. 24 hrs. Hi-tech security with CCTV cameras not yet fitted and theft are being continued.
3. Beautiful landscaped lawns are not seen.
4. No Jogging tracks and children park are made.
5. Swimming pool is not existing.
6. Intercom facility still not provided.

At present no facility for availability of News papers at normal rates, postal delivery of letters, has not been fixed up. This should have been inposition with the site management as a welfare measure for the residents. Its credit should have gone to them.
As soon as you look after the needs of the Somdatt’s Landmark residents and adopt them as your own. They would be happy to pay up the maintenance charges.
Do you sincerely feel that the residents should be still compelled to pay MC at this stage as desired by your office.
You are again requested to have your kind visit and address about the permanent solution to solve the grievances, as now we are part & parcel of Somdatt family.
Waiting for your reasonable reply.
Thanks
From:
The Somdatt- Landmark residences
Sector-116, Mohali.

-----------to be continue in next post [click to open next post]

0 Did I right ?????-I paid the maintenance bills of Somdatt Landmark Sector -116......

As I already shown FINAL NOTICE, which I got from SDB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. I lived in Somdatt Landmark Sector -116, Mohali(Punjab) project by SDB Infrastructure Ltd.  I moved here in October 2011. I paid two very earlier maintenance bills.. after that I found no one doing here -- maintenance even on one entertain me. No attend my complaints. Earlier every one complaints.. because problem really exists.. here they send bills quarterly.
How they calculate:
      Rs 1.50 per sq ft.  Sq Ft is your super area of your flat. So in mine case- it would become:
So maintenance bill for one quarter =
                    = 1249 x 1.50 x 3 + Service Tax @10% + Cess 2% + Sec. Cess 1%
                    = 5621 + 562+ 11+ 6
                    = Rs 6200/- [for one quarter]

Here I am showing the original copy of one bill duration 1-10-2011 to 31-12-2011:

Maintenance bill duration 1-10-2011 to 31-12-2011

and I paid two earlier bills - that is for two quarter

quarter 1- 1-10-2011 to 31-12-2011

quarter 2- 1-01-2012 to 31-03-2012

Both of receipt shown here:

Maintenance  bill Receipt duration 1-10-2011 to 31-12-2011

Maintenance  bill Receipt duration 1-01-2012 to 31-03-2012

Now check the emails --

----------Email ------------Dated-------Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:30 PM-----------

---

Greviances -Maintainance Charges - Somdatt LandMark , Mohali Sector 116 1 message

---

[In email I hide the email addresses of peoples- due to privacy reason]

From: xcxccxccccxcxcxcxcx Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:30 PM To: 'somdatt1@nda.vsnl.net.in'; 'somdattrealestate@yahoo.co.in'; 'suchetmonga@yahoo.co.in'; 'rohitctr@gmail.com'; 'Amarbir' Cc: 'xcxcxccxcxc@yahoo.co.in'; 'yxcxcxcxccxc_78@rediffmail.com'; 'grxccxcxccx72@gmail.com'; 'sxcxcxcxcxcxcx@smlisuzu.com'; xcxcxcxcxcx@rediff.com; 'cxcxcxcxcxcx@gmail.com'; 'xcxcxcxcxcx@yahoo.co.in'; 'Roohi Puri'; 'xcxcxcxcxc@allengers.net'; 'xcxcxcc@gmail.com'; 'xcccxcx@yahoo.com' Subject: Greviances -Maintainance Charges - Somdatt LandMark , Mohali Sector 116 Dear Mr. Brahmdatt, This is to inform that you that we the residents moved in after completing all our formalities with the belief of a new beginning , not realizing that it would be the beginning of whole set of problems. Defects in construction leading to seepage of all walls adjacent to bathrooms started becoming visible once we started using them .The same was duly informed in writing as well as verbally to the concerned people. Not receiving adequate response, we approached your office following which you came down personally as well as Mr. S.K Sharma ( Who Came twice) , but the problem s continue to persist. We have repaired our walls on our own cost but still the seepage is not rectified and is consistently increasing day by day due to Water leakage in the ducts. Major problem is that still there are no control measures taken by the concerned staff members. We are now issued a notice to submit the maintenance charges for the period oct-Dec’11 of Rs 1.5/sq ft within 20 days from the receipt of notice. Maintenance charges are to be charged on the provision of basic facilities to the residents as per agreement:- S.No Aspects of Maintenance Agreement Actual /present Status 1 Operation & Maintenance of Lifts Not Consistent, Stops in between ( Something on which one cannot rely) 2 Maintenance of Fire Fighting System Not available , always in locked condition 3 Water Supply Conditions differs from flat to flat 4 Sewerage OK 5 Common Lighting Area OK 6 Land Scaping Not even existing 7 Electricals Services such as generator, transformer, External Electrification Not self Starter, takes almost 10 minutes to restart 8 Maintenance and upkeep of internal pathways , boundary, wall fencing, Horticulture, Drainage System, street Lightning incomplete due to construction going on & No PROPER ISOLATION DONE 9 Operation of Maintenance of Generators, transformers Old generators installed (Don’t know the life of M/c), , new Genset should have been installed. 10 Maintenance of Green Areas in the Complex Non Existent 11 Water Distribution system/ Water filtration Plant/Swimming pool No existence of Swimming pool( Not even know where and When it shall be provided) 12 General Watch & Ward of Complex Not Much Focus on Cleaning, Security is only for Name- only gate keeper is there , street dogs are inside the Complex creating problem for children , no of thefts have already taken place in the premises 13 Maintenance & Upkeep of Car parking Area Not much effort seen till date 14 Maintenance of Club house Not yet operational, the Building itself is yet to be completed; No Final Date is known when It shall be made functional. Ø 24 hrs Hi-tech Security with CC TV camerasIn addition, as per your brochure, the following facilities are yet to be provided. Ø Beautifully landscaped lawns Ø Jogging tracks and Children Park Ø Intercom Facility The above claims can be verified by yourself /Staff and by not providing the above facilities in full, do you sincerely feel that the resident should be still compelled to pay the maintenance charges at this stage as desired by your office? You are requested to reply on our Grievances and let us the action plans. Below I hide the detail of all other society memmembers::: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email sent by number of peoples , I cant disclose the name of them here.....But if I need ..I will.....
SUCH EMAIL CLEARLY SHOWN -- ABOUT THEIR MAINTAINANCE ----WHAT THEY GAVE---

     DO YOU THINK FOR SUCH MAINTAINANCE -- I DID RIGHT -........

     THAT'S WHY FROM HERE.. I FOUGHT FOR THIS AMOUNT 12000(MY HARD EARNED MONEY)----which i think i should not paid

..............................................continues in the next post.... [click here to go on post]