I am waiting for Monday..Monday will decide for next
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Monday, February 10, 2014
0 I asked- Why should I Pay the mainatianence bill? to SYSTEM too.
I asked- Why should I Pay the Maintenance Bill for poor FLAT? to SDB Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Monga realtors, Police Admins, Human Rights, Cheif Minister of Punjab.
Today I send this email in Letter -too Respected S. Parkash Singh Badal our Cheif Minister of Punjab.
Regards
Today I send this email in Letter -too Respected S. Parkash Singh Badal our Cheif Minister of Punjab.
Regards
0 Do I have right to ask- to Somdatt Builder and Mongarealtors- Why Should I pay the maintenance bills??
|
Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> |
|
Who will GIVE the ANSWER?-Should I pay the maintenance bill? 17 messages |
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
0 Perfect Film Story - Presented by MongaRelators and Somdatt Landmark
I want to show you more things:
See these letter and Sorry Letter (which signed by us)-
when we called up by POLICE without making any formal complaint.
Such types of mental trauma gave Somdatt Landmark and
MongaRealtors to us many times. They just DEFORMED it -and give this shape.
And
How they represented the story.
0 Real Feedback of SomdattLandMark and MongRealtors -must reach to them
Lot of Feedbacks and Suggestion/ ways I got from all society members.
I got +ve feedback- all said- I am right. But important till yet - There is NOT EVEN a Single person who told me that - I am wrong- yes I have to pay- No one said this.
Every body says:
DONT PAY your hard earned money, its better do charity, instead of doing pay them.
Now taking this in a new and correct direction:
I request you all peoples who reach on this blog- can give a call or email -- and ask to this Builder and MongaRealtors.
"WHY SHOULD LOKESH PAY THE MANIATNCE BILL"
after having this condition since 2 years.
http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2014/01/mongarealtors-sold-me-this-flat-todays.html
http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2014/02/somdatt-landmark-and-mongarealtors-dont.html
(Somdatt/ MongaRealtors)) Email IDs:
Somdatt1@nda.vsnl.net.in, somdattlandmark@rediffmail.com, somdattrealestate@yahoo.co.in, suchetmonga@yahoo.co.in, rohit@mongarealtors.com
Phone Number: 09815233416 / 09915044444 / 011-41623610 / 0172-4634631
MyEmail_id(please use this for CC): lokesh.tester@gmail.com
I will be very thankful to all you guys
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
0 Expecting answer from Somdatt LandMark and MongRealtors and its society members !!!
I wrote this letter to the Monga Realtors and Society and asked them- Why Should I pay the maintenance bill.
|
|
Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> |
|
Please Reply Why I should PAY the Maintenance BILL? 2 messages |
0 Isn't it-unfair trade practice done by Monga Realtors and Somdatt Landmark in Mohali sector-116
See this 4th page of the registry. and think what is the difference in between these ones....
Here in the registry- In th circled area- the text is [right for use of open car parking] is written- MongaRealtors and Somdatt builder think - Geniune. and below the court order in published in Times of India.
Now see this article: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-11/mumbai/41969747_1_consumer-forum-car-parking-space-parking-slot
‘Can’t charge flat buyer extra for parking slot’
MUMBAI:
Emphasising that a flat buyer cannot be charged extra for a car parking
space, a consumer forum has fined a developer that committed this
"unfair trade practice".
The Central Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum last week directed Tata Housing Development Company to refund Rs 50,000 to Ghatkopar-based Suresh Mehta and pay him compensation of around Rs 20,000.
The Central Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum last week directed Tata Housing Development Company to refund Rs 50,000 to Ghatkopar-based Suresh Mehta and pay him compensation of around Rs 20,000.
"Car parking area is the common area of the society. Therefore, the
opponent (the developer) had no right to charge any amount for the sale
or use of the parking space," observed the forum. It took into
consideration a Supreme Court judgment which held that a developer can
only sell a flat and has no right to sell a parking space.
In his complaint, filed with the consumer forum last year, Mehta had said that he purchased on June 30, 2010, an apartment and car parking space at Betegaon, Palghar, for Rs 17.4 lakh. He maintained that Rs 50,000 was taken from him for car parking and another Rs 50,000 as clubhouse development charges.
Mehta said he came across a judgment in August 2010 that held that a builder or developer cannot sell stilt or open parking as the space is part of society common area. The verdict also held that, once the occupation certificate is issued and the society formed, the developer ceases to have any title on the open space.
Through a letter dated December 23, 2010, Mehta demanded a refund from the developer. He was told in response that the car parking was not sold; the developer said he was issued a right to use the space. Aggrieved, Mehta filed a complaint with the forum. The developer repeated its stand in the forum.
The forum said the agreement showed that the total amount paid by Mehta included charges for the parking space. "The documents on record corroborate the contention of the complainant that the flat's price was Rs 16.44 lakh and that he was required to pay Rs 50,000 for car parking space." The forum held that this amounted to an unfair trade practice.
In his complaint, filed with the consumer forum last year, Mehta had said that he purchased on June 30, 2010, an apartment and car parking space at Betegaon, Palghar, for Rs 17.4 lakh. He maintained that Rs 50,000 was taken from him for car parking and another Rs 50,000 as clubhouse development charges.
Mehta said he came across a judgment in August 2010 that held that a builder or developer cannot sell stilt or open parking as the space is part of society common area. The verdict also held that, once the occupation certificate is issued and the society formed, the developer ceases to have any title on the open space.
Through a letter dated December 23, 2010, Mehta demanded a refund from the developer. He was told in response that the car parking was not sold; the developer said he was issued a right to use the space. Aggrieved, Mehta filed a complaint with the forum. The developer repeated its stand in the forum.
The forum said the agreement showed that the total amount paid by Mehta included charges for the parking space. "The documents on record corroborate the contention of the complainant that the flat's price was Rs 16.44 lakh and that he was required to pay Rs 50,000 for car parking space." The forum held that this amounted to an unfair trade practice.
Monday, February 3, 2014
0 Should I PAY Maintenance for this worst FLAT delivered by Monga Realtors
Since 2 years: i m living in this FLAT.
http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2014/01/mongarealtors-sold-me-this-flat-todays.html
Since 2 years: I am fighting case in state consumer court.
Since 2 years: NO staff person listen and entertain my complaint.
This FLAT is my PRIMARY thing which I bought from you.
Six month before: You disconnect my Power backup after paying the backup bill. and my case dismissed in court due. Don't have enough energy and money to go in the higher court.
Now: You are ready to Disconnect WATER SUPPLY And LIFT to my FLAT and other services.
Do YOU THINK-
Should I PAY Maintainence bill to you for such FLAT??
http://sdbbuilder-vs-us.blogspot.in/2014/01/mongarealtors-sold-me-this-flat-todays.html
Since 2 years: I am fighting case in state consumer court.
Since 2 years: NO staff person listen and entertain my complaint.
This FLAT is my PRIMARY thing which I bought from you.
Six month before: You disconnect my Power backup after paying the backup bill. and my case dismissed in court due. Don't have enough energy and money to go in the higher court.
Now: You are ready to Disconnect WATER SUPPLY And LIFT to my FLAT and other services.
Do YOU THINK-
Should I PAY Maintainence bill to you for such FLAT??
0 Misleading advertisement by Monga Realtor and Somdatt LandMark: Isn't it??
In this advertisement they wrote: LUXURIOUS APPARTMENT. and moreover by showing their sample falt.
and more detail you can check here: http://www.mongarealtors.com/Project/SomDatt-Landmark-Mohali
And in actual: They Dilevered me this FLAT: [Read previous Post too]
and for this I am fighting consumer court case since 2 years. No REDEEM got in hand till today. This is our Judicary System.
How much it is hard to live in this FLAT- should i need to tell you...
Today I read a article in Times of India. Its interesting one.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Celebrities-endorsing-products-also-liable-for-misleading-advertisements-Panel/articleshow/29834388.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral
Just read this:
Its says:
NEW DELHI: If the skin whitening cream isn't as phenomenal as advertised or the hair oil not producing a lush mop as promised, you may soon be able to claim compensation not only from the advertisers, but from the celebrities endorsing the product.
The Central Consumer Protection Council(CCPC), under the chairmanship of minister K V Thomas, on Monday decided to set up a sub-committee to suggest strategies to deal with such advertisers. Among the concerns raised was peddling of products by celebrities.
"About 50% of the daylong conference was spent addressing ... the huge impact of misleading advertisements, particularly food items, hair oil and health products," said a CCPC member who attended the meeting in Kochi. "Even the celebrities must pay compensation in case there is a complaint," said Joseph Victor, a CCPC member.
Panel mulls measures to monitor ad claims
What seems to have moved the consumer affairs ministry is a direction from the MP high court to set up an ad monitoring panel as recommended by the Vibha Bhargava Commission. "An ad monitoring committee with proper budgetary support from the Centre may be set up to monitor the advertisements on regular basis... the committee will have the powers to (take) corrective actions and (impose) compensation," the CCPC said.
Sources said that the decision was taken unanimously by CCPC, which has members from central and state governments, besides representatives from consumer organizations and academicians. The sub-committee may be formed in less than a week and could submit its recommendations by February-end, sources said.
Some members told TOI the issue of southern superstar Mamootty endorsing products was discussed. "We have similar problems across the country. We have Shahrukh Khan or some other Hindi film star endorsing consumer items and they get huge payment for doing so. A misleading ads featuring such famous faces shown on TV even for a day serves the purpose of advertisers. We discussed how suo motu action can be taken against ads which have been withdrawn. Even the celebrities must pay compensation in case there is a complaint," said Joseph Victor, a CCPC member.
Another member, Ashim Sanyal, said he had raised the issue of monitoring ads, which are in huge numbers and across different modes and media. "We need to plan the mechanism for monitoring. The sub-committee will come out with directions and provisions to deal with the menace," he added. Lok Sabha MP Charles Dias, who also attended the meeting, told TOI that concerns were raised on manufacturers' ad spend, which is passed on to buyers. "Most of us felt that there should some sort of monitoring on how much is being spent on advertisements," he said.
The Central Consumer Protection Council(CCPC), under the chairmanship of minister K V Thomas, on Monday decided to set up a sub-committee to suggest strategies to deal with such advertisers. Among the concerns raised was peddling of products by celebrities.
"About 50% of the daylong conference was spent addressing ... the huge impact of misleading advertisements, particularly food items, hair oil and health products," said a CCPC member who attended the meeting in Kochi. "Even the celebrities must pay compensation in case there is a complaint," said Joseph Victor, a CCPC member.
Panel mulls measures to monitor ad claims
What seems to have moved the consumer affairs ministry is a direction from the MP high court to set up an ad monitoring panel as recommended by the Vibha Bhargava Commission. "An ad monitoring committee with proper budgetary support from the Centre may be set up to monitor the advertisements on regular basis... the committee will have the powers to (take) corrective actions and (impose) compensation," the CCPC said.
Sources said that the decision was taken unanimously by CCPC, which has members from central and state governments, besides representatives from consumer organizations and academicians. The sub-committee may be formed in less than a week and could submit its recommendations by February-end, sources said.
Some members told TOI the issue of southern superstar Mamootty endorsing products was discussed. "We have similar problems across the country. We have Shahrukh Khan or some other Hindi film star endorsing consumer items and they get huge payment for doing so. A misleading ads featuring such famous faces shown on TV even for a day serves the purpose of advertisers. We discussed how suo motu action can be taken against ads which have been withdrawn. Even the celebrities must pay compensation in case there is a complaint," said Joseph Victor, a CCPC member.
Another member, Ashim Sanyal, said he had raised the issue of monitoring ads, which are in huge numbers and across different modes and media. "We need to plan the mechanism for monitoring. The sub-committee will come out with directions and provisions to deal with the menace," he added. Lok Sabha MP Charles Dias, who also attended the meeting, told TOI that concerns were raised on manufacturers' ad spend, which is passed on to buyers. "Most of us felt that there should some sort of monitoring on how much is being spent on advertisements," he said.
0 Somdatt LandMark and MongaRealtors- don't wait for 15-Feb-2014
I am writing this in the reply of this below letter as per this letter they will stop my water supply in my FLAT as per maintenance agreement CLAUSE 12.
In the reply:
I wrote this email at 1:30AM on 4th FEB-2014. I sent this email to MONGA REALTORS only. I don't know why,but always have a soft corner for him, don't know why...
MY REPLY
In the reply:
I wrote this email at 1:30AM on 4th FEB-2014. I sent this email to MONGA REALTORS only. I don't know why,but always have a soft corner for him, don't know why...
MY REPLY
|
|
Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> |
|
Its a ATTEMPT--may be you Listen (so keeping private to you and Rohit) 1 message |
| Lokesh Kumar <lokesh.tester@gmail.com> | Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:31 AM | |||||
|
To:
SUCHET MONGA <suchetmonga@yahoo.co.in>, Rohit Chopra <rohit@mongarealtors.com>
| ||||||
| ||||||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
